Journal article
E. Lima, J. Oden, D. Hormuth, T. Yankeelov, R. C. Almeida
Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 2016
Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 2016
Semantic Scholar
DOI
PubMed
Cite
Cite
APA
Click to copy
Lima, E., Oden, J., Hormuth, D., Yankeelov, T., & Almeida, R. C. (2016). Selection, calibration, and validation of models of tumor growth. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Lima, E., J. Oden, D. Hormuth, T. Yankeelov, and R. C. Almeida. “Selection, Calibration, and Validation of Models of Tumor Growth.” Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences (2016).
MLA
Click to copy
Lima, E., et al. “Selection, Calibration, and Validation of Models of Tumor Growth.” Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 2016.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{e2016a,
title = {Selection, calibration, and validation of models of tumor growth.},
year = {2016},
journal = {Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences},
author = {Lima, E. and Oden, J. and Hormuth, D. and Yankeelov, T. and Almeida, R. C.}
}
Abstract
This paper presents general approaches for addressing some of the most important issues in predictive computational oncology concerned with developing classes of predictive models of tumor growth. First, the process of developing mathematical models of vascular tumors evolving in the complex, heterogeneous, macroenvironment of living tissue; second, the selection of the most plausible models among these classes, given relevant observational data; third, the statistical calibration and validation of models in these classes, and finally, the prediction of key Quantities of Interest (QOIs) relevant to patient survival and the effect of various therapies. The most challenging aspects of this endeavor is that all of these issues often involve confounding uncertainties: in observational data, in model parameters, in model selection, and in the features targeted in the prediction. Our approach can be referred to as "model agnostic" in that no single model is advocated; rather, a general approach that explores powerful mixture-theory representations of tissue behavior while accounting for a range of relevant biological factors is presented, which leads to many potentially predictive models. Then representative classes are identified which provide a starting point for the implementation of OPAL, the Occam Plausibility Algorithm (OPAL) which enables the modeler to select the most plausible models (for given data) and to determine if the model is a valid tool for predicting tumor growth and morphology (in vivo). All of these approaches account for uncertainties in the model, the observational data, the model parameters, and the target QOI. We demonstrate these processes by comparing a list of models for tumor growth, including reaction-diffusion models, phase-fields models, and models with and without mechanical deformation effects, for glioma growth measured in murine experiments. Examples are provided that exhibit quite acceptable predictions of tumor growth in laboratory animals while demonstrating successful implementations of OPAL.
